Pentax, why’d you let Nikon steal the user interface?

4 Nov

Just to clarify up front, when I say “steal”, I don’t mean “take a protected design”, I mean “grab the category” or “become best at”.

I’m talking about the incredible extent of manual operation and tactile feedback that was previously offered by the K-5 and is now showcased in even more spectacular fashion by the Nikon Df. Pentax, meanwhile, removed those features from the K-3.

Years ago, when I started to get interested in cameras above the point and shoot ranges, one that caught my eye was the Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 (why they re-use this repetitive naming with each new camera, I’ve no idea). The reason it caught my eye was that it had double-loaded its mode dial in a rather compelling way. The main knob was a classic mode dial with “red Auto”, PASM, direct access to scene modes for landscape, macro, sports, portrait and night portrait modes as well as SCN and Custom positions for further options. Below that was a lever with positions for single and continuous drive, time delay and some other setting I don’t recall (video?).

Pentax similarly appealed to me years later because the K-5 allowed metering mode (full, centre-weighted and spot) and focus mode (full, point select or central point) to be separately and directly controlled. You can run your thumb over the focus lever and immediately know what setting it’s on without taking your eye away from the viewfinder. You don’t miss a second of action that way.

By contrast, the K-3 has no information on the focus points even in the viewfinder. Exposure mode is visible, but I’ve always had trouble reading that info as often the light outside is much brighter than the illumination of those symbols.

In comes the Df and has many of those things easily visible, although not all of them discernible through tactile feedback. I appreciate Pentax’ ingenuity in offering a stills/video switch – much needed, great thinking – but I question their reluctance to ensure that the existing pivot switches could be accommodated, and that a simple one for the AA filter would also be included. The supersized mic jack truly is a gimmick by comparison – much less worthy of inclusion in my view.

Well, that’s my opinion on the user interface. The K-3 may well prove to be vastly technologically superior to the Df at a lower price point and with the limitations of a smaller sensor, but it would be nice to be left with a feeling that Pentax didn’t fire or retire the one guy that understood user interfaces.

By the way, if they can do a silver and black version, or a K-5 II with and without AA filter, why can’t they omit that stupid mode dial lock release lever and instead release one model with the mode dial lock button and one without? (Read the manual or a good review to know what I’m talking about – not the one by CNET because the reviewer for all I can discern didn’t understand how the lever is functions.) That would have left them space for one more functional lever. Just a thought.

Advertisements

One Response to “Pentax, why’d you let Nikon steal the user interface?”

  1. James November 5, 2013 at 9:17 pm #

    I completely agree, I really liked the function on my K-5. Saying that I also understand why they did it and I am also happy for the reason they did it (not happy that they did it). Contradicting, I know! But when the K-5 first came out you would read comments after comments after comments complaining that you had to push the button to unlock the dial and many responded saying that they liked it. I remember thinking to myself, with all the advancements from the K-7 and this is what you want to talk about?!?! Even when I was talking with Ned Bunnell and John Carlson at a function in Denver they also had mentioned that they received many comments about this. Even though as I didn’t mind having to push the button and don’t find it necessary to have the lever for this, I am happy that they have started to listen more to the majority of people and implemented something that the majority obvious wanted. Even though I really don’t agree with it. Another thing that they have finally listened to is the tethering (when I say Tether I am talking about controlling the camera from a computer and not looking at a photo on a monitor), They took this away after the K-20, I used it for my astrophotography to limit the camera movement (a little important when you are taking photos of things light years away). Anyway that is my input.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: